Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Itunes #4



A lot of universities and colleges are going this route probably because it’s less time consuming than going through stacks of paper. I also believe that they may use this technique so that it’s accessible to all students and if they have any sorts of questions they can just look online. It’s so much easier than tracking down the professor or other classmates in that class. 

One of the best advantages is that because universities and colleges are starting to use more and more technology students are always up to date. Being up to date is a great advantage mostly for the students, and because they are fully aware of the technology that is being used they are prepared to encounter the technology out in the workforce. 

An advantage for the professors is probably the fact that they are getting to learn something new along with the students. It is true that the stuff that these professors put online is free, but a lot of people are learning new things from them. 

I feel that there is kind of a catch to these online courses. I mean yes they are free, but I feel that there is some sort of an advantage for the professors. Maybe they get paid a certain amount of money depending on how many views they get. If this is the case (or something like this) then it is an advantage for both students and professors.

Friday, April 6, 2012

Post #3: Intro to Sociology



The online course that I chose to do is introduction to Sociology. The reason why I chose this course is because this is what I will be studying next year in university. This course is taught by Harvey Molotch a professor at New York University.

The very first lecture, Harvey begins by telling his students all these areas of learning and how they emerged and or are born from sociology. Areas include communications, demography and various versions of history. 

Due to all these areas emerging and or being born from sociology a philosopher by the name of August Comte expressed sociology to be the queen of social sciences.

Harvey later gets into C.Wright Mills who is a professor at Columbia University and his idea of sociology. Harvey introduces us with a term “Sociological Imagination” which is an idea that it matters who is around, and he begins his lesson from there.

He asks his students a simple question, why are we here? He explains how there are various ways of answering this questions and how each answer differs from another. He says that we have to look beyond the individual and their own sense of how they got to be where they are. He then goes into how all factors and forces shape our choices.

 An example he gives is of a motor boat. He says that we don’t move forward like a motor boat, however as we go forward all of these other forces are shaping, buffering, and determining that course of our existence, and only getting a handle of those forces will we understand where we are and why we are there.

He then goes into how society has been emerged and he gives us an example of doctors. Doctors from one specific country of which majority are women get paid less than doctors in countries of which majority are men and he explains that this is how the society has been emerged and shaped.

Harvey also tells us that if sociologists nowadays follows sociological imaginations than they would have full force. Sociological imagination calls for political action and it’s about being engaged in the world not just understand the world but change it.

His second lecture pretty much continues with the previous lecture and he introduces us with Max Weber’s famous phrase “what we need is a value free social science”. What he was basically trying to say was that if we manage to do this (what Weber said) is the only time when we will successfully  know what is going on around the world. Then he goes into how sociologist do surveys and samples and what they end up doing is manipulating those statistically so that we can see some sort of a connection/a cause and effect relationship. An example he gives us is the early death of children and the high rate of poverty.

Later he gets to a critical point in sociology which is the fact that sociologists do for society what medicine does for human health. They protect society and solve their problems by knowing the social body.

iTunes U: Blog Post #2


Over the past years technology has grown so much it is unbelievable. I believe this way of learning to be a really great technique, especially for kids in this generation. 

The reason being is because kids nowadays are constantly using technology and are always up to date therefore this way of learning seems highly appropriate. 

I have personally only become familiar with this type of learning through this English upgrade course otherwise before that, I never knew it existed. It’s honestly such a great way to learn for the student and teacher. 

It saves paper and any opportunities to lose or misplace assignments by bother the student and teacher. It’s also a lot easier to go through notes and refer back to them rather than going through a binder full of papers. 

The main advantage to this kind of learning would probably be the fact that it’s accessible at ANY time, it’s free, and most of all its unlimited. 

I don’t believe there can be cost reductions because if everything you learn is online it causes you to access the internet a lot and consistently. 

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Post #1: Khan Academy


I think learning off YouTube and Khan Academy is really effective. I have personally used Khan Academy myself and I found it to be a life saver. I used this academy for Data Management during first semester. What happened was that I was having a hard time with one of the units, near the very beginning of the course. My teacher did have much time half the time and when he did, I could barely understand his way of learning.

I tried getting a tutor but she ended up teaching me the wrong stuff which I probably would not have figured out until my teacher pointed out to me I was doing the stuff wrong.

Anyways, I went to my teacher and again I was unable to fully understand what he was trying to teach me, so he told me about Khan Academy and what they do and lucky I had already heard about it in my grade 11 math class. So he told me to go there if I had any more questions and that is what I ended up doing. I found it to be really helpful and really easy to learn from. I ended up acing that entire unit.

I eventually ended up dropping the course but while I was in it, I would use that website often. I love the fact that I have the ability to go back and fast forward just in case I miss something/don’t get it or I want to skip to something else. 

Monday, April 2, 2012

Shakespeare Blog Post #4


1954 Version:

                The 1954 version is extremely slow and takes a very long time to get to the point. There is nothing exciting or engaging in this version of the scene that attracts the viewer. Even the background music is fairly dull. There is a very minimum amount of dialogue and absolutely no action. The audience would most likely not prefer this version especially due to the fact that it is a very old version and is not modernized.

1968 Version:

                Although this version does not have much dialogue, it has a lot more action and music which makes up for the loss. It engages the audience and gets them hooked a lot more than the previous version.  It is a lot more modernized as well therefore attracts a great deal of people.

1996 Version:

                This version has a lot more action and dialogue going on. It is very engaging and is much modernized therefore attracts the audience a lot more. The mass majority of the audience is most likely high school students. This is perfect in terms of setting, actors, and visualisation because this version of the play is probably the one that the youth would enjoy watching.

Overall, in my opinion, the reason why one version of Romeo and Juliet is better than the other is simply due to the fact of the film being more modernized. Like I mentioned above, the mass majority of the audience are young high school students therefore they do not want to sit there and watch something that is “boring”. It is more likely that they will be more engaged and paying attention if they were to watch the 1996 version vs. the 1954. 

Sunday, March 25, 2012

Saturday, March 24, 2012

Shakespeare Blog Post #3

Centering around the comments that were on the twitter feed on March 21st, there were a lot I found myself agreeing with. What I did not agree with however was the fact that his writing is very bad. It is true that it is hard to understand and fully comprehend, however, Shakespeare is one of the best writers in history, and therefore his writing is not and should not be defined as “very bad”.

I somewhat agree in terms of the writing style but about the time period I find a little questionable. Speaking for myself, I do not like studying Shakespeare because of the time period it was written in. For me, I do not care as to what time period it was written in as long as I can understand it or I can somewhat depict what he is trying to say. This is where the writing style comes in. I feel as though it is not because of the writing style per say, it is more of the language that is used that is hard to understand. This is the reason as to why I found this comment to be a little questionable. In terms of language though, because it evolves so much on a day to day bases,  it is hard for people like us, in this day and age to read a piece of literature all the way back from the sixteenth/seventeenth century. I am not saying it is entirely non-understandable, but that because of the language that is used, it is very challenging. Another thing in which I agree with and find challenging is that there are significant amounts of double meanings and mixed motives. I feel as though maybe because of our generation when we read something we do not actually sit there and analyze it. We read something to enjoy it or because we are told to. Therefore because Shakespeare has a significant amount of double meanings and mixed motives its hardtop comprehend. Sometimes what also happens is that because it is so hard to understand, I end up reading it over and over again which ultimately frustrates me and I lose complete interest.

            The only possible way I overcome reading a play by Shakespeare is just telling myself that I HAVE to read it and finish it matter how long or how much time it takes me to understand. Recently what I found myself doing is finding a modern day version of the play that translates the actual version of the play exactly. This way I spend less time sitting there and frustrating myself over the dialogue and can finish it in a short period of time.

Tweets I agreed with:
#ndns2012 shakespeare is hard and confusing to read
#ndns2012 Shakespeare is difficult do to the fact that language is evolving everyday, whether it is beneficial or not, it is always changing
#ndns2012 its too hard to understand so my short attention span loses interest
#NDNS2012 Shakespeare has too many double meanings and mixed motives. Gets muddled half the time.

Tweet I disagree with:
#ndns2012 shakespeares writing is very baddd and hard to understand

Tweet I somewhat agreed with:
#NDNS2012 Students don't like studying Shakespeare because of the writing style used and because of the time period it was written in.